Date

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5minAgenda itemName

more persons, than just Martin should be able to open the GoToMeeting


Candidates:

  • Roberto
  • Tracy
  • Nader
0minchair@allno update
30minIssues

See email of Thorsten about issues with attributes:

  1. The current implementation of our CurrentPerformance classes are inheriting the following attributes:
  • object-class
  • name-binding
  • packages
  • allomorphs               


Does anybody know what they are for?

Do we need them?

Are there any opinions about deleting them from all the tech.spec. models?

Summary of the discussion: not needed

Decision:  - attributes should be removed.


2. Our CurrentPerformance classes are also inheriting:

  • operational-state
  • administrative-state


It seems rather clear that these attributes are at the wrong place.

The content should be represented in the model, but are they redundant?

Are there any opinions about how to proceed with these attributes?

Summary of the discussion: not needed for this object class - there attributes for pm in
- PAC-Configuration (administrativeState is performanceMonitoringIsAvail) and
- PAC-status (operationalState is performanceMonitoringIsOn) 

Decision:  - attributes should be removed.

20minInterface ValidatorDemo for Interface Validator

Action items