Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

 | 2am PDT | 5am EDT | 09:00 UTC | 10:00 BST | 11:00 CEST | 12:00 EEST | 14:30 IST | 17:00 CST | 18:00 JST |


Web Conference:

https://thorsten-heinze-telefonica-de.webex.com/thorsten-heinze-telefonica-de/j.php?MTID=m849236edb092dffd10071725f5b8839f 

Invited:

(please feel free to correct and update your names (wink) Thank you very much!!!) 

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
00:00Chair topic 
no update 

00:03

Admin

Next meetings

2021-10-20: Martin Skorupski

2021-10-27: Martin Skorupski

2021-11-03: Martin Skorupski

2021-11-10: Martin Skorupski 

00:05Synchronization

@Alexander Wenk

@Prathiba

Some answer about modeling and mappings can be found here

Working Assumption to be proven about figure 7-21 – UML model diagram – CdSpecificView

  • PtpDomainConstraint_Pac is a model OUTSIDE of the device (control-construct)
    • There is the first expectation that all attributes are already in the LTP(Sync) and CLOCK object class.
  • NeSync_Pac
    • under the assumption that "Ne..." mean "NetworkElement..." the "NeSync_Pac" could be called "ControlConstructSync_Pac" and attached to the ControlConstruct itself

CoreModel

  • ControlConstruct
    • LTP
      • - e-m-b-e-d-d-e-d-C-l-o-c-k- (ref to a clock)
        covered by UML-to-YANG tool pruning and refactoring. 
      • target
        • list embeddedClock → goes to leaf-list with type leafref with path /control-construct/collection-of-clocks/clock

Proposal

  • ControlConstruct
    • LTP
      • LP
        • synchPac
          • ref-to-clock


AI: How to deal with refactoring of the CoreModel to get all references from SyncModel to ControlContruct. 

 - Answer: as in the past - the UML2YANG tool does the corection correction to reference the core-model-1-4.yang.


Modeling of NeSnyc-Pac according to the working assumption above (some smaller changes expected)

Image Added


Looks like there are different versions with similar but different content.


00:

Relation between planning and actual data from the network


@Andreas Lattoch

Quick synch from last week

  • connector types to be standardized
  • work in progress - to be continued
  • Current work bases on the "EquipmentModel"

updated proposal

  • holders identified by a, c, ...
  • connectors identified by 0, 1, ...

Example

subrack-slot-port - 1-2-3 goes to a.b.3


END OF THE MEETING

00:00Mediator Instance Manager

Pre- Discussion happened yesterday 

  • info send by Thorsten on Monday 2021-05-177
  • in addition Thorsten will send the "background discussion slide"....

Mediator Instance Manager 

  • What is the protocol? NETCONF or REST or RESTCONF or ...
    • Working Assumption:  not decided
    • SIAE would like to decide based on efforts after analysis. 
    • UML include the "service" - but not the operational and maintenance layer
    • YAML (OpenAPI3) → UML (papyrus) → YANG → 

2021-05-25

  • Any questions?
    • no questions

2021-06-16

  • please see "App layer on top of the SDN controller" above.

Action items