Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
45 mins | General Administrative & Status | Karthik Sethuraman | - Next TAPI call: Next Tuesday on May 15
- Migration of TAPI UML to Eclipse Oxygen
- Target is Eclipse-Papyrus 3.3.0
- Importing a model created in Eclipse Mars mangles the end-roles of some associations
- Nigel Davis has discovered a pattern to this behavior and the fix needs to be coded (todo: Karthik Sethuraman)
- Expecting to write the script and perform this migration this week or next.
- TAPI Wiki updated to include TAPI Documentation section
- Idea is to put useful information on TAPI concepts and usage here
- The pages will be tagged as a draft until is is approved by the OTCC TST
|
60mins | OTSi Model | Nigel Davis | - Overall model skeleton based on Core
- Difference between Media Channel & Connection
- None - Both are ForwardingConstructs (FC) - FC conceptually constrains and enables forwarding flow
- Everything in a photonic layer is about channelizing the flow of photons or spectrum of light - hence it is an FC and FC in TAPI is modeled as a Connection
- Media Channel in TAPI is modeled as an OTSiG Connection (bundle of OTSi media channels)
- Media Channels in ITU-T - Constraining, concatenating and filtering the signal spectrum (ignores that OTSi requires DSP to resolve the spectrum)
Disaggregated Node with Overheads and no amplifiers
- Schematic with amplifier put back in the picture
- Relationship of OMS-OTS to OTSi
- Functional Flow and connectivity

- Encapsulated into LTPs, FCs, FCs are at same layer, are connected/concatenated

|
0 mins | Github Issues | Andrea Mazzini | - Not discussed due to lack of time - Notes from previous TAPI call below
- ETH VLAN Config - Issue #313
- ETHG (group of VLAN IDs) is used for OAM purposes where only a single VLAN is monitored

- All VLANs in ETHG has to be co-routed, but beyond the scope of the OAM ME/MA, each of these VLANs may have separate route. Thus ETHG is not necessarily E2E.
- But from an UNI-N side, all these VLANs are/should be bundled. So effectively they are a single connection

- Is the below valid to model or monitor as a bundled-connection even if they belong to different services and if they are co-routed in the transit domain. No if needs to be done, OVC (S-Tags) has to be used.

- Multi-layer NEP - Issue #309
|