| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| | | |
| | Sydney F2f Meeting Results | Nigel, Kam | |
| Liaisons |
| - Liaison response to H2020 - response approved - Note Victor/Telefonica is involved in the project as well
- OIF Liaison and attachment (see Liaisons page)
|
| External activities |
| - O-RAN - still looking at UML/Papyrus vs. YANG approaches to modeling
- IETF (Italo) - TE topology and tunneling models stable, CCAMP working on ODU/OTN application of IETF models, OTN, Ethernet and Photonic models (Flexgrid and WSON), Photonic impairments aware
- TIP (Victor) - PSE WG - interested in future interaction with us on photonic impairment aware model
|
| Internal activities |
| - TAPI (Karthik)
- WT (Thorsten) - 5th PoC white paper
- post on wiki, add pointers to ONF website
- Thorsten could provide a more summarized version for external view (discuss offline what to point to on ONF website)
- recent decisions:
- current MW model has 6 Pacs, this will be split from one UML into several UML
- TR-532 will then reference the UML and YANG and interface validator
- TR will cover not only interface definition and include Pacs attached to link, forwarding construct - more related to controller NBI and not just SBI
- time schedule tbd
- DMIP (Thorsten)
- working on expanding coverage of models
- OTIM
|
| Next call and meetings |
| - April 15th conflict - ask if anyone needs to have the call held, otherwise hold to April 29
- Beijing f2f
|
3 Comments
Italo Busi
Lyndon Ong : I noticed that the liaison response to H2020 has been approved but I cannot find the text for the LS response
On the OTCC mailing list I have seen the incoming LS from H2020 but have not received any proposed response
I also cannot find neither the incoming LS nor the proposed response in Liaisons
Am I missing anything?
Thanks, Italo
Hing-Kam Lam
I have posted both the incoming LS from H2020 and the ONF response LS on Liaisons
Italo Busi
Thanks Kam