Child pages
  • 2022-01-14 IISOMI Meeting notes
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Date

Attendees

Apologies:

Agenda

  • Administrative
  • UML → YANG Mapping Tool funding
  • Papyrus Releases
    • Consider a plan for convergence of ITU-T Q14/15, ONF Common IM and TAPI to 2020-06 (4.16) version
  • Proposals of capturing discussion items
  • Feature/condition
  • Convention of UML property names in document/comment/description
  • Papyrus-Model2Doc further investigations?
  • Private GitHub
  • Public GitHub cleanup
  • Gendoc Issues: output for Interfaces, Operations, Associations, Abstractions 
  • Modular and decoupled modeling process
  • Agenda of next call
  • AOB

Discussion items

#

Time

Item

Who

Notes

15 minAdmin: Call planAll

 Leader: Andrea (Bernd not available) 

 Leader: Nigel

Leader: Kam

Leader: Bernd

Leader: Scott

210 min

Admin: IISOMI Action Items status

All

IISOMI Action Items review (every meeting)

Action items done

Refreshed Action Items

  • Andrea Mazzini  Create a Guideline/Tooling wiki page(s) for listing the tasks
  • Scott Mansfield  To take the gendoc examples from the guidelines and perform regression test. 
    • Also decide on version of gendoc and Papyrus
    • Version for initial regression test is p2020-06
  •  Scott Mansfield  To investigate why none of the <<cond>> is retrieved from the model (confirm with Andrea Mazzini 
    • Andrea indicated the had attempted to apply analogous rules to member-end to include other properties. Andrea tried various techniques to get client and supplier but with no success 
      • Probably need to review the UML metadata
    • Andrea was able to print the target string
  • Scott Mansfield To investigate how to get client and server values for an abstraction association for gendoc.
  • Nigel Davis  determine what Jira form structure etc. ONF can create IISOMI. Provide example/detail etc. for discussion.


30minUML → YANG Mapping Tool fundingMartin

O-RAN cooperation

October 1: O-RAN policy has changed collaboration rules. (O-RAN Alliance is registered in Germany)

October 15: Martin Skorupski checked with O-RAN the tooling funding status.  There is hope, not dead, but not moving either. 

Martin Skorupski  Get a written statement from O-RAN leadership on state of tooling funding's

November 19 discussion: Martin reported on the progress of requesting funding from O-RAN for UML-YANG tooling. The proposal will be up for voting in O-RAN.  


42minPapyrus Releases

Papyrus Releases

November 19 discussion: The TR-512 v1.5 Core model was developed using Eclipse 2019-09. It the model can migrate to 2020-06 seamlessly, Q14/15 might move G.7711 v4.0 (12/2021 consent) also to Eclipse 2020-06. To verify the seamless migration: 

  • Nigel Davis  Try to move TR-512 v1.5 core model to 2020-06 (4.16) Eclipse
  • Hing-Kam Lam Try to move TR-512 v1.5 core model to 2020-06 (4.16) Eclipse

2021-12-03: 

  • from Kam - diagrams from TR-512 v1.5 core model on 2020-06 (4.16) Eclipse looks fine
  • proposal for next week ITU-T: IISOMI moves to 2020-06, because gen-doc works find 
  • TAPI will follow after some tests will be done by Andrea Mazzini
  • Nigel Davis  Try to move TR-512 v1.5 core model to 2020-06 (4.16) Eclipse
55 min

Proposals for capturing discussion items 


Prior discussion: 2021-10-29 IISOMI Meeting Minutes #2

Prior discussion pointed out that:

  • a private repository is not the appropriate place for the items since not everyone has access to this
  • the ONF GitHub is publicly available but not all participants are allowed to contribute to it
  • there is no single ONF repository which could host such Issues; IISOMI is spread over many repositories
  • it might be possible to cover the discussions in Wiki pages
  • new discussions should be captured in the Meeting Minutes and then copied to the Wiki pages
  • Bernd Zeuner  Draft an example Wiki page that capture an discussion item

Proposal wiki page from Bernd for capturing discussion items:

2022-01-07:

  • Follow-up after progress made with Jira ( ) as per action for Nigel Davis 
70minFeature/condition

Prior discussion: IISOMI 2021-09-03 Meeting Minutes, #3

81 min

Convention of UML property names in document/comment/description

Prior discussion: 2021-10-29 IISOMI Meeting Minutes #5

  • Bernd Zeuner  Update the Mapping Guidelines with a rule that artefact names within the descriptions should be converted to YANG style.

2022-01-07:

9
Papyrus-Model2Doc feature

Prior discussion: 2021-05-28 IISOMI Meeting notes #3

10

Private GitHub

11

Cleanup of the existing public GitHub (ONF EAGLE), rationalize the forks/branches

Prior discussion: IISOMI 2021-09-24 Meeting Minutes #10

12

GenDoc Issues

Prior discussion: 2021-05-28 IISOMI Meeting notes #6

  • Scott Mansfield    Provide  gendoc  examples  to  implement  the  first  two bullets
    • 2021-05-28 IISOMI Meeting notes #6
    • GenDoc didn't generate constraint
    • GenDoc OstigOTtpSource::txti:EByte multiplicity [64] is not generated correctly
    • Discussion Needed:  To agree on a specific format for operation, then implement
1310minModular and decoupled modeling processHing-Kam LamNigel Davis 

2021-12-03

from OIMT

CoreModel FD - to of the tree

Composed FC-Switch .... with no sense if independent

.

Driver of Model structure (arrangement)

usage of stereo-types

  • aggregate
  • leaf
  • admin relationships
  • Chris has nice ideas - but needs to be further analyzed.

First try of "modelling profiles" on CoreModel

Target:

  • Split CoreModel in "smaller" parts - decoupling 
  • Rules needs to be described/defined/documented.

Further details:

2022-01-07:

  • Nigel Davis noted that OIMT have agreed to develop the profile and apply to a part of the core as an example. This can be presented to IISOMI in February.
  • Nigel Davis Provide an overview of the DDD trial profile and show application to the core model.
14
Coding of Target Path
  • In particular, if I understand correctly, for the root element object class (i.e., red element), the format is actually not “[/<ModelName>:<ClassName>:<navigable association end role name>]” as indicated in the UML guidelines v1.3.03 but it is in the format of “[/<ModelName>:<ClassName>:<name of the RootElement stereotype>]”
  • Model Name or Prefix
15
Agenda of next callAll
  • Administrative
    • Call plan (schedule, leader)
  • Review IISOMI Action Items
  • Coding of Target Path
  • UML → YANG Mapping Tool funding
  • Papyrus Releases
    • Consider a plan for convergence of ITU-T Q14/15, ONF Common IM and TAPI to 2020-06 (4.16) version
  • Proposals of capturing discussion items
  • Feature/condition
  • Convention of UML property names in document/comment/description
  • Papyrus-Model2Doc further investigations?
  • Private GitHub
  • Public GitHub cleanup
  • Gendoc Issues: output for Interfaces, Operations, Associations, Abstractions 
  • Modular and decoupled modeling process
  • Agenda of next call
  • AOB