Covers contributing codes through "Pull Request" in the OIMT GitHub repositories
(Suggestd by Nigel & Kam from post meeting discussion with the IISOMI team. The assumption is that ONF should have already applied the CLA rule to the ONF GitHub https://github.com/OpenNetworkingFoundation)
EC: The "How". The gateway/agent for accessing. It defines the rule/requirement of accessing.
CD: The "What". The thing to be viewed by the client in the CPI (control plane interface)
CC/CP: The "Where". The interface port to access the CE.
In the current v1.4 UML, the ControlConstructExposesExposureContextassociation should be ControlConstructAccessesExposureContext
One Vmf can provide multiple views from the same set of resource.
An ExposureContext can only expose one highest level (most outer) ConstraintDomain,
Additional clarification on 2021.01.21
The model allows access to multiple ExposureContext from a single ControlPort. For example, to support multiple users/applications at the same CPI (control plane interface) ControlPort.
Consideration of multiple ControlPort vs multiple ExposureContext
High-level security control and coarse grain operation control are set at the ControlPort.
Additional ControlPort instances could be instantiated to meet different security requirements or operation previlage.
Fine grain control (e.g., at object/attribute level) are set at the ExposureContext
Additional clarification for TR-512.8 is needed.
Lifecycle of EC and its dependency on CD
Additional associations
Multiplicity
Start up bootstrap:
CD representing the controller
Then administrator create ....
2021.01.28 discussion
Malcolm's sharing
Discussion:
Client cannot see all things in the CD for the client context (CC), such as the resource allocation, view mapping
Exposure Context 1 (EC1) and EC2 and their contained CDs reveal the view 1 and view 2 to the client
Note that Exposure Context 1 (EC1) and EC2 extend beyond the Controller CD.
For dealing with the communication infrastruture.
Need to look at the CD and EC for managing the communication infrastructure
Control of thecontrol infrastructure
Questions:
Is security an implicit part of the Exposure Context (EC)?
Do we need an explicit Controller Admin EC?
Or do e allow the Control Construct in the Admin CD to directly access all resources in the Controller?
View Mapping
Single or One per view ...
...
Need to think about the implications on the server context (in the client controller) when multiple views are provided
Nigel's sharing
Bootstrap steps: Controller / What it will control / name translation between Server context and local context / create client context for the client to use the resource /
Could one builds VN (for client) with planned resources?
Is name mapping part of view mapping?
Name translations: IN from the south (server), OUT to the north (client)
View in the same namespace and view in different namespace
Aspects: (1) Bootstrap, (2) Create/maintain/modify client contexts, (3) Attach the controller to the comms infrastructure
View mapping in the local space (Abstraction/refactoring), Name translations (from south to local, from local to north), ,
Resources from planning to deployment
Need the temporal model
2021.02.04 brief discussion
Change View Mapping Function (VMF) to View Transformation Function (VTF), which might include functions, in addition to name mapping, abstraction, merging, partitioning, order rearranging, etc.
Malcolm & Nigel to brainstorm on: List the things that VTF can do; Pattern; many-1, 1-many
2021.02.25 Clarification on the modeling of contexts (Client/Server/Administrative)
0 min
Media Channel
Nigel
Multi-pointed Media Channels: Multi-source multi-destination
2021.01.21 discussion
TR-512.A.4 Figure 4-28
Representation of topology and frequency slot occupancy
Agree to use the Bidirectional overlaid trees approach to tackle the issue
Nigel Davis Start to draw simple single tree, find minimal forms, then draw the overlaid tree, then use in both TAPI and Core
Pattern of simple tree (non-intersecting)
Primitives: Merge (M) / Split (S)
n nodes: 2**n options
e.g., 2 nodes: 2**2=4 options: MM, MS, SM, SS
Pattern of overlaid trees
Might waste wavelenth
2021.02.04 brief discussion
Simple tree structure to evaluate network blocking
Build tree structure for each of the points (Transponders or ROADMs), then use overlay tree to evaluate blocking.
For each of the originating points (e.g., A, B, C, D, etc.), build a transmit tree through the intermedate coupler/splitter nodes to the end points (i.e.,A-1.2.3.4.5-J; A-1.2.3.4.5.-L; etc.), then look at the overlapping segments (e.g., 2.3) of the overlaid trees (e.g., A-1.2.3.4.5-J and C-2.3-G).
Identify the disjoint trees (e.g, B and C)
Nigel DavisMalcolm Betts Write text to explain the restriction and rules for bi/uni-directional for evaluating network blocking. Aim for adding to TR-512.A.4 (section 4.4.9)
2021.02.xx Review of writeup on multi-point MC restriction/rules
