Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
IM-D | Administrative | | - Organizational aspect of conducting the modeling/API standards work
- Suggest people to think about it off-line first
- Scope
|
| | | |
| 3Q deliverable | | - Review plan: oimt2018.KL.008.17_reviewPlan.docx
- Expect comments on three documents: .4 topology, .7 Specification and A.7 Control/Interaction example
- A.7: one chapter on SDN controller, and one on general
- .7 (spec) has higher priority than .4 (topology)
|
| Photonic parameters | | - Bernd asked what to do with the photonic parameters
- It belongs to the TAPI/OTIM discussion, will be normalized in TAPI
|
IM-E | TAPI | Lyndon, Karthik | - Joint discussion with OIF on the OIF demo findings
- The OIF demo finding is in the attachment to the incoming LS
- The list of issues has been went through in the OTCC call a couple of weeks ago
- Further discussed at this call for resolution
- See Lyndon's note for the discussion details
- Action item - Lyndon Ong: provide the link of the discussion note.
- Issue #1: Leafref
- #2: Abstraction
- #3: Resotration control - open for contribution
- #4: Bidirectional relationships
- #5: URL flexibility. MEF/ODL alignment. Protocol encoding issue, not modeling issue
- #6: HTTP result codes
- #7: Notification scaling
- #8: Equipment identifier
- #9: Automated establishment of I-/E-NNI links
|
| | | |